When is the first spurious variable selected by sequential regression procedures?
序贯回归程序何时选入第一个无关变量?AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维回归的变量选择与解路径,未明确涉及所列因果、面板、宏观或金融对象,因此缺乏细分归类依据。
序贯回归程序何时选入第一个无关变量?AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Applied statisticians use sequential regression procedures to rank explanatory variables and, in settings of low correlations between variables and strong true effect sizes, expect that variables at the top of this ranking are truly relevant to the response. In a regime of certain sparsity levels, however, we show that the lasso, forward stepwise regression, and least angle regression include the first spurious variable unexpectedly early. We derive a sharp prediction of the rank of the first spurious variable for these three procedures, demonstrating that it occurs earlier and earlier as the regression coefficients become denser. This phenomenon persists for statistically independent Gaussian random designs and arbitrarily large true effects. We gain insight by identifying the underlying cause and then introduce a simple visualization tool termed the double-ranking diagram to improve on these methods. We obtain the first result establishing the exact equivalence between the lasso and least angle regression in the early stages of solution paths beyond orthogonal designs. This equivalence implies that many important model selection results concerning the lasso can be carried over to least angle regression.