跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:虽涉及多元时间序列,摘要的直接对象是神经活动,未提供宏观时间序列或经济网络研究的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Bo Zhou
David E. Moorman
Sam Behseta
Hernando Ombao
Babak Shahbaba

刻画决策过程中神经元间相互作用的动态贝叶斯模型

研究问题
如何刻画决策过程中神经元脉冲序列的相互作用随时间变化,避免时间汇总指标掩盖刺激、行动和奖励阶段的差异?
方法与思路
作者提出动态贝叶斯模型描述神经活动与神经元间作用强度的时变性,并分析前额叶神经元在奖励与非奖励条件下的同步。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,不同神经元群分别在刺激后或奖励出现时同步,且同步程度随奖励条件变化;模型还可用于带潜在结构的多元时间序列。
阅读关注点
应核对脉冲序列模型、时变作用与同步性的定义、潜在结构的识别,以及处理大量同时记录神经元时的计算规模。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;先验、验证设计和不确定性结果未说明,神经同步发现不能直接解释为因果机制。

原文摘要

The goal of this paper is to develop a novel statistical model for studying cross-neuronal spike train interactions during decision making. For an individual to successfully complete the task of decision-making, a number of temporally-organized events must occur: stimuli must be detected, potential outcomes must be evaluated, behaviors must be executed or inhibited, and outcomes (such as reward or no-reward) must be experienced. Due to the complexity of this process, it is likely the case that decision-making is encoded by the temporally-precise interactions between large populations of neurons. Most existing statistical models, however, are inadequate for analyzing such a phenomenon because they provide only an aggregated measure of interactions over time. To address this considerable limitation, we propose a dynamic Bayesian model which captures the time-varying nature of neuronal activity (such as the time-varying strength of the interactions between neurons). The proposed method yielded results that reveal new insight into the dynamic nature of population coding in the prefrontal cortex during decision making. In our analysis, we note that while some neurons in the prefrontal cortex do not synchronize their firing activity until the presence of a reward, a different set of neurons synchronize their activity shortly after stimulus onset. These differentially synchronizing sub-populations of neurons suggests a continuum of population representation of the reward-seeking task. Secondly, our analyses also suggest that the degree of synchronization differs between the rewarded and non-rewarded conditions. Moreover, the proposed model is scalable to handle data on many simultaneously-recorded neurons and is applicable to analyzing other types of multivariate time series data with latent structure. Supplementary materials (including computer codes) for our paper are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文