跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论预测评价与排序,且评分目标明确包括分位数和期望分位数;未限定宏观应用。

反馈分类问题

Of Quantiles and Expectiles: Consistent Scoring Functions, Choquet Representations and Forecast Rankings

分位数与期望分位数:一致评分函数、Choquet 表示与预测排序

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Werner Ehm
Tilmann Gneiting
Alexander Jordan
Fabian Krüger

分位数与期望分位数:一致评分函数、Choquet 表示与预测排序

研究问题
比较分位数或期望分位数预测时,如何使评分符合指定预测目标,并判断某个预测是否在所有一致评分函数下占优?
方法与思路
作者将一致评分函数表示为基本评分函数的混合,通过这些基本函数比较平均评分,并用 Murphy 图展示预测之间的差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,混合表示给出预测占优的简便检查,经验比较只需有限个基本评分元素,并为相关评分提供经济解释。
阅读关注点
应核对一致性和占优的精确定义、混合表示覆盖的评分函数范围,以及有限元素检查规则与样本比较的不确定性处理。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;未提供统计检验条件或实证数值,图上样本评分比较不能直接视为总体占优或普遍预测优势。

原文摘要

Summary In the practice of point prediction, it is desirable that forecasters receive a directive in the form of a statistical functional. For example, forecasters might be asked to report the mean or a quantile of their predictive distributions. When evaluating and comparing competing forecasts, it is then critical that the scoring function used for these purposes be consistent for the functional at hand, in the sense that the expected score is minimized when following the directive. We show that any scoring function that is consistent for a quantile or an expectile functional can be represented as a mixture of elementary or extremal scoring functions that form a linearly parameterized family. Scoring functions for the mean value and probability forecasts of binary events constitute important examples. The extremal scoring functions admit appealing economic interpretations of quantiles and expectiles in the context of betting and investment problems. The Choquet-type mixture representations give rise to simple checks of whether a forecast dominates another in the sense that it is preferable under any consistent scoring function. In empirical settings it suffices to compare the average scores for only a finite number of extremal elements. Plots of the average scores with respect to the extremal scoring functions, which we call Murphy diagrams, permit detailed comparisons of the relative merits of competing forecasts.

笔记与分组