跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究因果效应的随机化检验,并明确处理单位间溢出、聚类干扰和空间干扰,支持这两个分类。

反馈分类问题

A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Randomization Tests of Causal Effects under General Interference

一般干扰下因果效应随机化检验的图论方法

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Puelz
Guillaume Basse
Avi Feller
Panos Toulis

一般干扰下因果效应随机化检验的图论方法

研究问题
当一个单位的结果受其他单位处理分配影响、感兴趣的零假设不再尖锐时,如何构造有效的随机化检验?
方法与思路
作者将单位与处理分配构成二部图,寻找使零假设尖锐的完全二部子图,并在该子图内实施条件随机化检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法适用于任意单位间干扰下的一类零假设,联系子图大小与功效,并展示聚类及空间干扰应用。
阅读关注点
应核对可检验零假设的范围、条件化后的分配机制、子图选择如何影响有效性与功效,以及图搜索的计算成本。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要;一般干扰不代表所有零假设都可检验。具体有效性条件、比较数值及警务实验结果未说明。

原文摘要

Abstract Interference exists when a unit's outcome depends on another unit's treatment assignment. For example, intensive policing on one street could have a spillover effect on neighbouring streets. Classical randomization tests typically break down in this setting because many null hypotheses of interest are no longer sharp under interference. A promising alternative is to instead construct a conditional randomization test on a subset of units and assignments for which a given null hypothesis is sharp. Finding these subsets is challenging, however, and existing methods are limited to special cases or have limited power. In this paper, we propose valid and easy-to-implement randomization tests for a general class of null hypotheses under arbitrary interference between units. Our key idea is to represent the hypothesis of interest as a bipartite graph between units and assignments, and to find an appropriate biclique of this graph. Importantly, the null hypothesis is sharp within this biclique, enabling conditional randomization-based tests. We also connect the size of the biclique to statistical power. Moreover, we can apply off-the-shelf graph clustering methods to find such bicliques efficiently and at scale. We illustrate our approach in settings with clustered interference and show advantages over methods designed specifically for that setting. We then apply our method to a large-scale policing experiment in Medellín, Colombia, where interference has a spatial structure.

笔记与分组