跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究工资及反事实分布分解,并明确使用处理效应识别策略处理样本选择。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Esfandiar Maasoumi
Le Wang

存在样本选择时,我们能了解多少种族工资差距?

研究问题
工资仅对就业者可见时,如何分解黑人与白人女性的工资分布差距,并区分构成与市场效应以及就业群体和总体人口的结论?
方法与思路
作者运用处理效应文献中的识别策略与非参数逆概率加权,识别就业女性的工资及反事实分布,再为总体人口的分解成分构造界限。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法将工资差距分解扩展至分位数和不平等指标,并显示劳动参与及目标人口选择影响可得结论,质疑忽略选择的点估计解释。
阅读关注点
应核对反事实分布识别、加权所需条件及总体界限的假设,特别区分市场效应的分解含义与因果解释,并查看界限的信息量。
阅读边界
所给出版社摘要未列出选择假设、界限公式或实证数值;不能据此把种族组别差距解释为种族的因果效应,也无法判断界限宽度。

原文摘要

We examine the distance and relations between the distributions of wages for two exogenously identified groups (black and white women here). The literature commonly employs decomposition methods for the conditional means, to propose explanations for observed wage differentials, as “structural” components, attributable to difference in market structures, and the “composition” components, attributable to difference in characteristics and skills. Estimation of these components is often hampered by restrictive wage structure assumptions, and sample selection issues (wages are only observed for those working). We address these issues by first utilizing modern strategies in the treatment effects literature to identify the entire distributions of wages and counterfactual wages among working women, which afford a separation of composition and market effects. We avoid restrictive wage structure modeling by nonparametric inverse probability weighting methods. This approach allows for decomposition beyond the gap at the mean, and can deliver distributional statistics of interest, such as inequalities and target quantiles. Accounting for selection, we extend the basic framework to provide a computationally convenient way to identify bounds on the decomposed components for the whole population. We employ these methods to understand the sources and dynamics of the racial gap in the U.S. Our analysis reveals that what may be learned about the racial gap is impacted by labor force participation, and is also sensitive to the choice of population of interest. Our results question what may be gleaned from the commonly reported point estimates when sample selection is neglected.

笔记与分组