跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及生存分析与缺失协变量处理,未明确研究所列因果、面板或结构估计方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mark D. Schluchter
Kirby L. Jackson

协变量部分缺失时删失生存数据的对数线性分析

研究问题
在生存资料存在删失且部分分类协变量缺失时,如何利用全部个案估计风险模型,并减少完整个案分析的信息损失?
方法与思路
作者结合分段风险的对数线性模型与协变量列联表的多项模型,以含比例拟合步骤的EM或牛顿—拉夫森法求最大似然。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该方法在实例中较完整个案分析提高效率,并明确要求缺失机制可忽略及删失分布不依赖缺失协变量。
阅读关注点
应核对缺失机制与删失假设的具体含义、时间区间划分和标准误计算,并关注第二个实例中非随机缺失的可能影响。
阅读边界
依据稿件版本未注明的索引摘要;效率收益依赖所述缺失与删失条件,实例不能验证这些条件成立,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Log-linear models provide a flexible means of extending life table techniques for the analysis of censored survival data with categorical covariates, as discussed by Holford (1980) and Laird and Olivier (1981). We extend this methodology to incorporate cases in which one or more of the categorical covariates are sometimes missing. Maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters are calculated using data from all cases. This can result in large gains in efficiency over standard methods that require the exclusion of cases with incomplete data. With this approach, we assume that the hazard function, conditional on the covariates, is a stepwise function over disjoint intervals of time. The model has two parts: a log-linear model describing the hazard parameters, and a multinomial model describing the probabilities in the contingency table defined by the covariates. The main interest is in the model for the hazard parameters. We show how to calculate maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of the model either by an application of the EM algorithm in conjunction with one cycle of iterative proportional fitting in the M step or by using the Newton—Raphson algorithm. Estimates of standard errors are computed from the empirical information matrix. When using our proposed maximum likelihood approach, two additional assumptions are needed in addition to the usual assumptions of noninformative censoring. First, the mechanism causing missing covariates must be ignorable (Rubin 1976) in that the probability that a covariate is missing cannot depend on the covariate itself or on other covariates that are missing. The second assumption is that the distribution of the random censoring variable does not depend on any covariate that is missing. The first example, investigating the influence of several covariates on time to diagnosis of high blood pressure in a large cohort of men, shows clear gains in efficiency of our approach over analysis of complete cases and illustrates the flexibility of the log-linear approach. A second example of survival times of symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphoma patients shows interesting differences between the complete-case analysis and the maximum likelihood approach, which could be due to a nonrandom missing-value mechanism.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文