跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以孟德尔随机化、相关工具变量及直接因果效应识别为中心,直接属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

Prediction of causal genes at GWAS loci with pleiotropic gene regulatory effects using sets of correlated instrumental variables

利用相关工具变量集合预测具有多效性调控作用的 GWAS 位点因果基因

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mariyam Khan
Sean Bankier
Johan Bjorkegren
Tom Michoel

利用相关工具变量集合预测具有多效性调控作用的 GWAS 位点因果基因

研究问题
同一基因组位点的工具变量彼此相关且共同关联多个基因时,多变量孟德尔随机化能否识别直接效应并筛选候选因果基因?
方法与思路
作者用因果推断理论分析相关工具变量集合的识别条件,开展模拟,并结合冠心病 GWAS 位点与 STARNET 表达数量性状数据。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称相关工具变量可满足工具集合条件,模拟支持其适用性;应用预测了十二个位点的因果基因,同时指出跨组织联合分析的限制。
阅读关注点
应核对工具集合条件与模型设定、相关性和多效性如何分别处理,以及逐组织分析的必要性和候选基因预测的不确定性。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已同行评审或获期刊接收;摘要中的无偏及小方差表述有场景限制,不能推广至任意相关工具。

原文摘要

Multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) is a statistical technique that uses sets of genetic instruments to estimate the direct causal effects of multiple exposures on an outcome of interest. At genomic loci with pleiotropic gene regulatory effects, that is, loci where the same genetic variants are associated to multiple nearby genes, MVMR can potentially be used to predict candidate causal genes. However, consensus in the field dictates that the genetic instruments in MVMR must be independent, which is usually not possible when considering a group of candidate genes from the same locus. We used causal inference theory to show that MVMR with correlated instruments satisfies the instrumental set condition. This is a classical result by Brito and Pearl (2002) for structural equation models that guarantees the identifiability of causal effects in situations where multiple exposures collectively, but not individually, separate a set of instrumental variables from an outcome variable. Extensive simulations confirmed the validity and usefulness of these theoretical results even at modest sample sizes. Importantly, the causal effect estimates remain unbiased and their variance small when instruments are highly correlated. We applied MVMR with correlated instrumental variable sets at risk loci from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for coronary artery disease using eQTL data from the STARNET study. Our method predicts causal genes at twelve loci, each associated with multiple colocated genes in multiple tissues. However, the extensive degree of regulatory pleiotropy across tissues and the limited number of causal variants in each locus still require that MVMR is run on a tissue-by-tissue basis, and testing all gene-tissue pairs at a given locus in a single model to predict causal gene-tissue combinations remains infeasible.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文