Testable Implications of Parametric Assumptions in Ordered Random Utility Models
有序随机效用模型中参数假设的可检验含义AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论有序随机效用模型、类型分布与效用映射的参数假设及其可检验含义,属于离散选择与结构估计方向。
有序随机效用模型中参数假设的可检验含义AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We establish the testable implications of ordered random utility models under nonparametric, semi-nonparametric, and parametric assumptions. After characterizing these models in a continuous setting and in the absence of fundamental parametric restrictions, we show that assumptions about the type distribution alone are immaterial, while assumptions about the map linking types to utilities are relevant only insofar as they restrict the class of utilities at stake. Importantly, the joint presence of such parametric assumptions, as is common practice, further restricts the empirical content of the model. We then provide a characterization of parametric ordered-logit models. Finally, we apply our results to economically relevant settings.