跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是条件异方差创新下的协整秩检验与重抽样,直接属于时间序列;未以估计金融波动率为研究目标。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Giuseppe Cavaliere
Anders Rahbek
A.M. Robert Taylor

条件异方差下的协整秩检验

研究问题
当序列受到全局平稳且条件异方差的鞅差创新驱动时,传统高斯协整秩检验是否仍有效,bootstrap 如何改善小样本表现?
方法与思路
作者分析传统秩统计量的极限零分布,并比较 wild 与独立同分布 bootstrap 的一阶有效性,以及前者保留异方差模式的性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两类 bootstrap 均复现一阶零分布;数值证据支持 wild bootstrap 的小样本表现,并提供利率期限结构应用。
阅读关注点
应核对全局平稳与鞅差条件、重抽样如何保留异方差模式,以及模拟创新过程、样本规模和利率应用的具体设定。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,不能将结论推广至非平稳波动或任意异方差;数值优势的范围、幅度及版本差异均未说明。

原文摘要

We analyze the properties of the conventional Gaussian-based cointegrating rank tests of Johansen (1996, Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models) in the case where the vector of series under test is driven by globally stationary, conditionally heteroskedastic (martingale difference) innovations. We first demonstrate that the limiting null distributions of the rank statistics coincide with those derived by previous authors who assume either independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) or (strict and covariance) stationary martingale difference innovations. We then propose wild bootstrap implementations of the cointegrating rank tests and demonstrate that the associated bootstrap rank statistics replicate the first-order asymptotic null distributions of the rank statistics. We show that the same is also true of the corresponding rank tests based on the i.i.d. bootstrap of Swensen (2006, Econometrica 74, 1699–1714). The wild bootstrap, however, has the important property that, unlike the i.i.d. bootstrap, it preserves in the resampled data the pattern of heteroskedasticity present in the original shocks. Consistent with this, numerical evidence suggests that, relative to tests based on the asymptotic critical values or the i.i.d. bootstrap, the wild bootstrap rank tests perform very well in small samples under a variety of conditionally heteroskedastic innovation processes. An empirical application to the term structure of interest rates is given.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文