Safe and Effective Importance Sampling
安全且有效的重要性抽样AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要提出通用蒙特卡洛计算方法,没有明确的经济或金融计量应用方向。
反馈分类问题安全且有效的重要性抽样AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We present two improvements on the technique of importance sampling. First, we show that importance sampling from a mixture of densities, using those densities as control variates, results in a useful upper bound on the asymptotic variance. That bound is a small multiple of the asymptotic variance of importance sampling from the best single component density. This allows one to benefit from the great variance reductions obtainable by importance sampling, while protecting against the equally great variance increases that might take the practitioner by surprise. The second improvement is to show how importance sampling from two or more densities can be used to approach a zero sampling variance even for integrands that take both positive and negative values.