Equivalence of Smoothing Parameter Selectors in Density and Intensity Estimation
密度与强度估计中平滑参数选择器的等价性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用核密度与点过程强度估计,未明确涉及所列分布效应或高频金融计量。
密度与强度估计中平滑参数选择器的等价性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Kernel smoothing is an attractive method for the nonparametric estimation of either a probability density function or the intensity function of a nonstationary Poisson process. In each case the amount of smoothing, controlled by the bandwidth, that is, smoothing parameter, is crucial to the performance of the estimator. Bandwidth selection by cross-validation has been widely studied in the context of density estimation. A bandwidth selector in the intensity estimation case has been proposed that minimizes an estimate of the mean squared error under the assumption that the data are generated by a stationary Cox process. This article shows that these two methods each select the same bandwidth, even though they are motivated in much different ways. In addition to providing further justification of each method, this equivalence of smoothing parameter selectors yields new insights for both density and intensity estimation. A benefit for intensity estimation is that this equivalence makes it clear how the Cox process method may be applied to kernels that are nonuniform, or even of higher order. Another benefit is that this duality between problems makes it clear how to apply the well-developed asymptotic methods for understanding density estimation in the intensity setting. A benefit for density estimation is that it motivates an analog of the Cox process method, which provides a useful nonasymptotic means of studying that problem. The specific forms of the estimators and smoothing parameter selectors are introduced in Section 1. The basic equivalence result is stated in Section 2. Sections 3 and 4 describe new insights that follow for intensity and density estimation, respectively. Section 5 discusses modification of these ideas to take boundary effects into consideration and shows how they can be used to motivate new boundary adjustments in intensity estimation.