跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的风险指临床死亡风险,主体是生存模型迁移学习,缺乏金融风险或其他所列方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ziyi Li
Yu Shen
Jing Ning

容纳风险估计中的时变异质性:Cox 模型下的迁移学习

研究问题
如何从大型癌症登记队列向单一癌症中心借用信息,提高个体死亡风险估计精度,同时容纳两队列随时间变化的风险差异?
方法与思路
作者在 Cox 模型下,对两队列回归系数与基线风险函数的差异施加 Lasso 惩罚,以联合算法自适应控制信息借用程度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要报告,模拟中该方法较单独使用目标队列更精确,较直接合并队列更能应对队列差异,并展示炎性乳腺癌应用。
阅读关注点
应核对系数与基线风险差异的参数化、惩罚选择、信息可迁移的条件,以及源队列不适配时是否出现负迁移。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;精度与稳健性比较限于所述模拟,具体条件和幅度未说明,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Transfer learning has attracted increasing attention in recent years for adaptively borrowing information across different data cohorts in various settings. Cancer registries have been widely used in clinical research because of their easy accessibility and large sample size. Our method is motivated by the question of how to utilize cancer registry data as a complement to improve the estimation precision of individual risks of death for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. When transferring information for risk estimation based on the cancer registries (i.e., source cohort) to a single cancer center (i.e., target cohort), time-varying population heterogeneity needs to be appropriately acknowledged. However, there is no literature on how to adaptively transfer knowledge on risk estimation with time-to-event data from the source cohort to the target cohort while adjusting for time-varying differences in event risks between the two sources. Our goal is to address this statistical challenge by developing a transfer learning approach under the Cox proportional hazards model. To allow data-adaptive levels of information borrowing, we impose Lasso penalties on the discrepancies in regression coefficients and baseline hazard functions between the two cohorts, which are jointly solved in the proposed transfer learning algorithm. As shown in the extensive simulation studies, the proposed method yields more precise individualized risk estimation than using the target cohort alone. Meanwhile, our method demonstrates satisfactory robustness against cohort differences compared with the method that directly combines the target and source data in the Cox model. We develop a more accurate risk estimation model for the MD Anderson IBC cohort given various treatment and baseline covariates, while adaptively borrowing information from the National Cancer Database to improve risk assessment.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文