跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究植物表型的分层函数数据方法,未明确涉及所列面板计量或其他细分框架。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yuhang Xu
Yehua Li
Dan Nettleton

植物功能表型分析的嵌套分层函数数据建模与推断

研究问题
种子根部弯曲速率具有种子、组和基因型三层嵌套结构时,如何分解函数变异,并检验弯曲过程是否与月相日期有关?
方法与思路
作者用分层函数随机效应描述变异,以惩罚张量积样条估计协方差,结合多层函数主成分、似然比与置换检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提准则在模拟中较高频率选对主成分数,基于函数主成分的似然检验比采用工作独立假设的检验功效更高。
阅读关注点
应核对三层随机效应的可识别性、主成分截断准则和置换单位,并检查月相日期效应是否与成像批次等因素混杂。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;摘要未报告月相效应的实证结论或模拟数值,功效比较仅针对所述设定,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In a plant science Root Image Study, the process of seedling roots bending in response to gravity is recorded using digital cameras, and the bending rates are modeled as functional plant phenotype data. The functional phenotypes are collected from seeds representing a large variety of genotypes and have a three-level nested hierarchical structure, with seeds nested in groups nested in genotypes. The seeds are imaged on different days of the lunar cycle, and an important scientific question is whether there are lunar effects on root bending. We allow the mean function of the bending rate to depend on the lunar day and model the phenotypic variation between genotypes, groups of seeds imaged together, and individual seeds by hierarchical functional random effects. We estimate the covariance functions of the functional random effects by a fast penalized tensor product spline approach, perform multi-level functional principal component analysis (FPCA) using the best linear unbiased predictor of the principal component scores, and improve the efficiency of mean estimation by iterative decorrelation. We choose the number of principal components using a conditional Akaike information criterion and test the lunar day effect using generalized likelihood ratio test statistics based on the marginal and conditional likelihoods. We also propose a permutation procedure to evaluate the null distribution of the test statistics. Our simulation studies show that our model selection criterion selects the correct number of principal components with remarkably high frequency, and the likelihood-based tests based on FPCA have higher power than a test based on working independence. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组