Identification of Causal Effects with a Bunching Design
利用聚 bunching 设计识别因果效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是利用连续处理变量的聚集现象克服选择偏误,并识别特定人群的因果响应,因此归入因果推断。
利用聚 bunching 设计识别因果效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We show that causal effects can be identified when there is bunching in the distribution of a continuous treatment variable, without imposing any parametric assumptions. This yields a new nonparametric method for overcoming selection bias in the absence of instrumental variables, panel data, or other popular research designs for causal inference. The method leverages the change of variables theorem from integration theory, relating the selection bias to the ratio of the density of the treatment and the density of the part of the outcome that varies with confounders. At the bunching point, the treatment level is constant, so the variation in the outcomes is due entirely to unobservables, allowing us to identify the denominator. Our main result identifies the average causal response to the treatment among individuals who marginally select into the bunching point. We further show that under additional smoothness assumptions on the selection bias, treatment effects away from the bunching point may also be identified. We propose estimators based on standard software packages and apply the method to estimate the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on birth weight.
强度变化的重复处理下的工具变量回归
Instrumental variable models with repeated endogenous treatments are popular in empirical research using pooled cross-sectional or short panel datasets. This paper proposes a novel semi-parametric approach that explicitly considers 1) path dependency in the contemporaneous treatment effect and 2) a direct carryover effect from past treatments. We demonstrate that when either of these new features is present, the standard two-stage least squares estimator is generally…
内生性面板数据中连续处理效应的双重/去偏机器学习
We propose a double/debiased machine learning framework to estimate average derivative effects in nonparametric panel models with two-way fixed effects. It extends instrumental variable methods to panel settings, handles continuous treatments and various forms of endogeneity, and introduces a cross-fitting scheme to restore independence after eliminating time fixed effects. A penalized GMM debiasing term enables automatic debiased machine learning with endogeneity. Our…
一般工具变量下因果效应的识别与去偏学习
Instrumental variable methods are fundamental to causal inference when treatment assignment is confounded by unobserved variables. In this article, we develop a general nonparametric causal framework for identification and learning with multi-categorical or continuous instrumental variables. Specifically, the mean potential outcomes and the average treatment effect can be identified via a regular weighting function derived from the proposed framework. Leveraging…
用于政策学习的半参数工具变量双重差分方法
Summary Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel-trend assumption to identify the average treatment effect on the treated. However, the parallel-trend assumption may be violated in the presence of unmeasured confounding, and the average treatment effect on the treated may not be useful in learning a treatment assignment policy…
嵌套非参数工具变量回归
Several causal parameters in short panel data models are functionals of a nested nonparametric instrumental variable regression (nested NPIV). Recent examples include mediated, time varying, and long term treatment effects identified using proxy variables. In econometrics, examples arise in triangular simultaneous equations and hedonic price systems. However, it appears that explicit mean square convergence rates for nested NPIV are unknown, preventing inference on some of…
用于政策学习的半参数工具变量双重差分方法
Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel trends assumption to identify the average treatment effect on the treated. However, the parallel trends assumption may be violated in the presence of unmeasured confounding, and the average treatment effect on the treated may not be useful in learning a treatment assignment policy…