Causal Mediation Analysis for an Interrupted Time Series: Stabilized Mediator Weighting with an Application to a Vehicle Emissions Policy
中断时间序列的因果中介分析:稳定中介加权及车辆排放政策应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要同时研究政策中介效应识别与单序列中断设计,并明确处理滞后历史和时间相关性。
中断时间序列的因果中介分析:稳定中介加权及车辆排放政策应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Population-level policies are introduced at a fixed time and evaluated from a single series of aggregate outcomes, and the interrupted time series design estimates the total shift in an outcome after the intervention. When the policy is expected to act through a measurable pathway, the total effect is less informative than its decomposition into direct and indirect effects. We formulate causal mediation for a single interrupted time series and study stabilized mediator weighting as the estimator of the natural direct and indirect effects. Because the intervention is a deterministic function, the exposure weight equals one and the exposure contrast is identified through the segmented-regression level shift, so only the mediator pathway is weighted. We add a cumulative mediator weight that carries the lagged confounder history, incorporate a concurrent event as a second interruption, and replace variance formulas that treat the estimated weights as fixed with a block-residual bootstrap that keeps the deterministic exposure timing intact and resamples the mediator and outcome residuals in moving blocks. In a simulation calibrated to daily data, the unweighted product-of-coefficients estimator is biased under mediator-outcome confounding, with an indirect-effect bias near $0.19$ and coverage of $0.003$, whereas stabilized weighting reduces the bias to about $0.03$ and improves indirect-effect coverage from near zero to about $0.83$. Applied to the 2019 termination of Ontario's Drive Clean vehicle emissions testing program, the method estimates a direct reduction in ground-level ozone of $2.113$ parts per billion (95\% interval $-3.384$ to $-0.841$) that is robust across four Toronto regions, a positive but heterogeneous indirect effect through nitrogen dioxide, and a total effect near the boundary of significance; a pre-pandemic sensitivity analysis agrees with the primary results.