Non-Parametric Inference for Clustered Binary and Count Data when Only Summary Information is Available
仅有汇总信息时聚类二元与计数数据的非参数推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究聚类响应的随机效应分布识别,未说明面板时间结构或离散选择机制,故不足以归入所列细分。
仅有汇总信息时聚类二元与计数数据的非参数推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary Data in the form of pairs (X,Y), where the response Y is a count, arise in many applications, including problems involving stratified or two-stage sampling. Such data are often analysed by using random-effects models, where the distribution of Y, conditional on X and on an unobserved random parameter Θ, is taken to be either binomial or Poisson, and the distribution of Θ is connected through a link function to a random effect. The latter is sometimes supposed to be normally distributed, but that assumption can lead to serious biases if it is not satisfied. This difficulty has motivated an extensive literature on non-parametric techniques for cases where the random-effect distribution is unknown, but that methodology requires detailed cluster level data. No non-parametric techniques are available for instances where only summary data are accessible. We show that the random-effect distribution is actually non-parametrically identifiable from crude summary data, and we suggest a sieve method for inference in this case. Non-parametric approaches to both parameter estimation and prediction are introduced, and empirical techniques are developed for choosing tuning parameters. These methods are shown to outperform their parametric counterparts when the model is misspecified, and to perform almost as well as parametric methods when the model is correct.