Optimal subgroup selection
最优子群选择AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确将子群选择推广到处理与对照情形中的异质性处理效应，因果分类依据来自这一扩展。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
最优子群选择
- 研究问题
- 如何从样本中选择尽可能大的低复杂度子群，同时以规定概率保证该区域内回归函数处处超过预设阈值，而非仅有样本表象？
- 方法与思路
- 作者将子群选择写为带概率保证的约束优化问题，以选中区域的分布质量定义遗憾，并分析样本量与第一类错误概率下的最优速率。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称给出遗憾的极小极大最优速率，揭示平滑性和集合逼近能力的共同作用，并说明如何推广到异质性处理效应选择。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对统一阈值保证的概率含义、候选集合复杂度、平滑与逼近条件，以及上下界证明和处理效应扩展所需的识别条件。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，同行评审及期刊接收均未核实；摘要未给出速率公式、完整假设或算法，因果扩展的条件也未说明。
原文摘要
In clinical trials and other applications, we often see regions of the feature space that appear to exhibit interesting behaviour, but it is unclear whether these observed phenomena are reflected at the population level. Focusing on a regression setting, we consider the subgroup selection challenge of identifying a region of the feature space on which the regression function exceeds a pre-determined threshold. We formulate the problem as one of constrained optimisation, where we seek a low-complexity, data-dependent selection set on which, with a guaranteed probability, the regression function is uniformly at least as large as the threshold; subject to this constraint, we would like the region to contain as much mass under the marginal feature distribution as possible. This leads to a natural notion of regret, and our main contribution is to determine the minimax optimal rate for this regret in both the sample size and the Type I error probability. The rate involves a delicate interplay between parameters that control the smoothness of the regression function, as well as exponents that quantify the extent to which the optimal selection set at the population level can be approximated by families of well-behaved subsets. Finally, we expand the scope of our previous results by illustrating how they may be generalised to a treatment and control setting, where interest lies in the heterogeneous treatment effect.