跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦评审机制、排序激励与通用统计估计,未直接对应所列计量领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yuling Yan
Weijie J Su
Jianqing Fan

机器学习同行评审中用于指数族估计的保序机制

研究问题
如何利用作者对多篇投稿质量的自报排序调整评审分数,并兼顾排序报告的激励、质量估计精度与机制适用范围?
方法与思路
作者将保序机制扩展至指数族,使调整分数贴近原始评分且遵循作者排序,并分析报告激励、估计误差及会议数据。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在凸可加效用下作者有如实排序的激励;特定条件下估计近于极小极大最优,会议数据分析也显示精度改善。
阅读关注点
应核对指数族适用条件、真实报告结论的量词与比较对象,以及总变差约束和代理真实质量的构造是否支持精度评价。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要解读。摘要未说明完整分布条件、证明和改善幅度;代理质量不等于真实质量,也不能推断后续版本变化。

原文摘要

Abstract In 2023, the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) required authors with multiple submissions to rank their papers by perceived quality. In this paper, we leverage these author-specified rankings to enhance peer review in machine learning and artificial intelligence conferences by extending the isotonic mechanism to exponential family distributions. This mechanism produces adjusted scores closely aligned with the original scores while strictly adhering to the author-specified rankings. An appealing feature of the mechanism is its applicability to a broad class of exponential family distributions without requiring knowledge of the specific distribution form. We show an author is incentivized to provide accurate rankings if her utility is a convex additive function of the adjusted review scores. For a subclass of exponential family distributions, we prove that an author reports truthfully only if elicitation involves pairwise comparisons between her submissions, thus highlighting the optimality of rankings in truthful information elicitation. Moreover, the adjusted scores significantly enhance estimation accuracy compared to original scores and achieve near-minimax optimality when ground-truth scores have bounded total variation. We conclude with a numerical analysis using ICML 2023 ranking data, demonstrating substantial estimation improvements in approximating a proxy ground-truth quality of submissions via the isotonic mechanism.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文