跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究高斯 ARFIMA 长记忆时间序列模型及其似然估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Offer Lieberman

长记忆模型的代入估计

研究问题
在均值未知的高斯 ARFIMA 模型中,将均值估计值代入似然后,为何仍可能出现常规最大似然所没有的二阶偏差?
方法与思路
作者对代入最大似然和 Whittle 最大似然作渐近展开,追踪 Bartlett 恒等式失效产生的偏差项,并考察 ARFIMA 特例。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称二阶偏差中存在额外项,其来源是第一 Bartlett 恒等式失效;作者认为这似乎解释了既有模拟观察到的偏差。
阅读关注点
读全文应核对均值估计的收敛要求、长记忆参数范围、展开余项与额外偏差项,并区分本文推导和所引用的模拟结果。
阅读边界
仅据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要,部分公式已缺失,不能重建完整信息矩阵或似然表达式,也不能确定偏差结论的普遍范围。

原文摘要

We consider the Gaussian ARFIMA(j,d,l) model, with spectral density and an unknown mean . For this class of models, the n−1-normalized information matrix of the full parameter vector, (μ,θ), is asymptotically degenerate. To estimate θ, Dahlhaus (1989, Annals of Statistics 17, 1749–1766) suggested using the maximizer of the plug-in log-likelihood, , where is any n(1−2d)/2-consistent estimator of μ. The resulting estimator is a plug-in maximum likelihood estimator (PMLE). This estimator is asymptotically normal, efficient, and consistent, but in finite samples it has some serious drawbacks. Primarily, none of the Bartlett identities associated with are satisfied for fixed n. Cheung and Diebold (1994, Journal of Econometrics 62, 301–316) conducted a Monte Carlo simulation study and reported that the bias of the PMLE is about 3–4 times the bias of the regular maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). In this paper, we derive asymptotic expansions for the PMLE and show that its second-order bias is contaminated by an additional term, which does not exist in regular cases. This term arises because of the failure of the first Bartlett identity to hold and seems to explain Cheung and Diebold's simulated results. We derive similar expansions for the Whittle MLE, which is another estimator tacitly using the plug-in principle. An application to the ARFIMA(0,d,0) shows that the additional bias terms are considerable.Research on this topic commenced during 2000–2002, while the author was visiting the Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University. The author is most grateful to the Cowles Foundation for their generous hospitality and to Donald Andrews and Peter Phillips for numerous helpful comments.

笔记与分组