跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦高维预测性能检验与交叉验证方法,属于统计方法论,未涉及所提供领域细分中的因果推断、面板、时间序列、资产定价等具体方向,故不选择。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Iris Ivy Gauran
Hernando Ombao
Zhaoxia Yu

基于穷举嵌套交叉验证的高维数据预测性能检验

研究问题
摘要称,研究如何在高维数据分析中检验两个模型拟合算法的预测误差差异,并解决K折交叉验证估计量因数据划分不同而结论不一致、可重复性差的问题。
方法与思路
作者提出基于穷举嵌套交叉验证的预测性能检验与置信区间,并给出该估计量的可计算闭式表达式以降低计算成本;摘要还称通过数值实验比较不同策略,并应用于一项RNA测序研究。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要明确陈述的贡献是:提出一种新的预测性能检验与有效置信区间,用于判定两个模型拟合算法间预测误差的差异;给出可处理的闭式表达以缓解计算复杂度;并探讨在高维情形下控制第一类错误率的同时提升统计功效的策略。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对:检验的原假设与统计量构造、置信区间的覆盖性质依据、闭式表达式的推导条件、第一类错误与功效的模拟设定,以及RNA测序应用中的具体模型与结论是否支持摘要表述。
阅读边界
仅凭摘要无法判断检验的渐近性质、有限样本表现、闭式表达式的适用范围与假设,也无法核实数值实验与RNA测序应用的具体结果;摘要未说明识别假设与理论证明细节。

原文摘要

It is crucial to assess the predictive performance of a model to establish its practicality and relevance in real-world scenarios, particularly for high-dimensional data analysis. Among data splitting or resampling methods, cross-validation (CV) is extensively used for several tasks such as estimating the prediction error, tuning the regularization parameter, and selecting the most suitable predictive model among competing alternatives. The $K$-fold cross-validation is a popular CV method but its limitation is that the risk estimates are highly dependent on the partitioning of the data (for training and testing). Here, the issues regarding the reproducibility of the $K$-fold CV estimator are demonstrated in hypothesis testing wherein different partitions lead to notably disparate conclusions. This study presents a novel predictive performance test and valid confidence intervals based on exhaustive nested cross-validation for determining the difference in prediction error between two model-fitting algorithms. A naive implementation of the exhaustive nested cross-validation is computationally costly. Here, we address concerns regarding computational complexity by devising a computationally tractable closed-form expression for the proposed cross-validation estimator. Our study also investigates strategies aimed at enhancing statistical power within high-dimensional scenarios while controlling the Type I error rate. \tr{Through comprehensive numerical experiments, we demonstrate that Ridge-based methods using bias to measure uncertainty of CV estimates and adaptive hyperparameter selection provide the most reliable approach for high-dimensional predictive performance testing.} To illustrate the practical utility of our method, we apply it to an RNA sequencing study and demonstrate its effectiveness in the context of biological data analysis.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文