Minimum Contrast Empirical Likelihood Inference of Discontinuity in Density *
基于最小对比的密度不连续性经验似然推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将断点回归设计中的密度操纵检验作为重要特例,并联系局部平均处理效应的识别条件,故归入因果推断。
基于最小对比的密度不连续性经验似然推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article investigates the asymptotic properties of a simple empirical-likelihood-based inference method for discontinuity in density. The parameter of interest is a function of two one-sided limits of the probability density function at (possibly) two cut-off points. Our approach is based on the first-order conditions from a minimum contrast problem. We investigate both first-order and second-order properties of the proposed method. We characterize the leading coverage error of our inference method and propose a coverage-error-optimal (CE-optimal, hereafter) bandwidth selector. We show that the empirical likelihood ratio statistic is Bartlett correctable. An important special case is the manipulation testing problem in a regression discontinuity design (RDD), where the parameter of interest is the density difference at a known threshold. In RDD, the continuity of the density of the assignment variable at the threshold is considered as a “no-manipulation” behavioral assumption, which is a testable implication of an identifying condition for the local average treatment effect. When specialized to the manipulation testing problem, the CE-optimal bandwidth selector has an explicit form. We propose a data-driven CE-optimal bandwidth selector for use in practice. Results from Monte Carlo simulations are presented. Usefulness of our method is illustrated by an empirical example.