跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要研究统计交互参数与工作模型稳健性,随机试验示例不足以明确其因果识别框架。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stijn Vansteelandt
Eric J. Tchetgen
James M. Robins

统计交互作用的多重稳健推断

研究问题
当暴露主效应或其他因素与结局的关联模型误设时,如何对两个暴露之间的统计交互参数进行稳健估计和检验?
方法与思路
作者在恒等或对数链接的条件均值模型下,结合暴露条件联合分布信息,在至少一个工作子模型成立的并集模型中估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出多重稳健交互估计;当暴露联合分布由设计或遗传机制已知时,可对加性无交互原假设作渐近分布无关检验。
阅读关注点
应核对交互参数的定义、并集模型包含哪些子模型,以及已知暴露分布如何参与估计并支持特殊情形的检验结论。
阅读边界
仅依据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未说明完整稳健条件,统计交互也不能自动解释为因果交互。

原文摘要

A primary focus of an increasing number of scientific studies is to determine whether two exposures interact in the effect that they produce on an outcome of interest. Interaction is commonly assessed by fitting regression models in which the linear predictor includes the product between those exposures. When the main interest lies in the interaction, this approach is not entirely satisfactory because it is prone to (possibly severe) bias when the main exposure effects or the association between outcome and extraneous factors are misspecified. In this article, we therefore consider conditional mean models with identity or log link which postulate the statistical interaction in terms of a finite-dimensional parameter, but which are otherwise unspecified. We show that estimation of the interaction parameter is often not feasible in this model because it would require nonparametric estimation of auxiliary conditional expectations given high-dimensional variables. We thus consider 'multiply robust estimation' under a union model that assumes at least one of several working submodels holds. Our approach is novel in that it makes use of information on the joint distribution of the exposures conditional on the extraneous factors in making inferences about the interaction parameter of interest. In the special case of a randomized trial or a family-based genetic study in which the joint exposure distribution is known by design or by Mendelian inheritance, the resulting multiply robust procedure leads to asymptotically distribution-free tests of the null hypothesis of no interaction on an additive scale. We illustrate the methods via simulation and the analysis of a randomized follow-up study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文