Support recovery without incoherence: A case for nonconvex regularization
无需非相干条件的支持恢复:非凸正则化的理由AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:内容是通用稀疏回归与非凸正则化理论,图模型应用未提供经济网络或金融领域的直接依据。
无需非相干条件的支持恢复:非凸正则化的理由AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We develop a new primal-dual witness proof framework that may be used to establish variable selection consistency and $\ell_{\infty}$-bounds for sparse regression problems, even when the loss function and regularizer are nonconvex. We use this method to prove two theorems concerning support recovery and $\ell_{\infty}$-guarantees for a regression estimator in a general setting. Notably, our theory applies to all potential stationary points of the objective and certifies that the stationary point is unique under mild conditions. Our results provide a strong theoretical justification for the use of nonconvex regularization: For certain nonconvex regularizers with vanishing derivative away from the origin, any stationary point can be used to recover the support without requiring the typical incoherence conditions present in $\ell_{1}$-based methods. We also derive corollaries illustrating the implications of our theorems for composite objective functions involving losses such as least squares, nonconvex modified least squares for errors-in-variables linear regression, the negative log likelihood for generalized linear models and the graphical Lasso. We conclude with empirical studies that corroborate our theoretical predictions.