跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究通胀预期形成,并检验自回归时间序列预测结构。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Edward J. Kane
Burton G. Malkiel

通胀横截面预测中的自回归与非自回归成分

研究问题
机构投资者如何形成通胀预测,回归正常水平与误差学习模型能否仅解释为使用历史通胀信息的自回归预测结构?
方法与思路
作者利用多个年份的投资者调查截面,估计两类预期模型,并在穆斯意义的理性预期假设下检验纯自回归结构。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称检验拒绝纯自回归结构,正常通胀预期的差异及非零截距表明,与历史通胀不共线的信息参与了预测形成。
阅读关注点
应核对理性预期假设如何支持检验、调查年份与受访者如何匹配,以及截距和正常通胀预期差异的统计解释。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 OpenAlex 摘要;拒绝结论依赖其假设和检验设定,摘要未说明具体统计量、样本规模或替代解释。

原文摘要

Using cross-section data collected from a panel of institutional investors in 1969, 1970, 1972, this paper focuses on how knowledgeable individuals formulate forecasts of future rates of price inflation, We estimate return-to-normality and error-learning forecasting models and inquire whether such equations can be interpreted simply as reduced forms of an autoregressive forecasting structure. Assuming that respondents' expectations were formed rationally in the sense of Muth, a series of tests lead us to reject the hypothesis of a purely autoregressive forecasting structure. Placed in the context of the return-to-normality model, the decisive evidence consists both of significantly nonzero intercepts and of impor- tant variations in survey respondents' anticipated normal rates of inflation that cannot be explained as a reduced-form reflection of past variation in observed inflation rates. These findings indicate that information not collinear with past realizations of price-level change plays an important role in the forecasting process, important enough to allow expected near-term rates of inflation to follow observed inflation rates more closely than autoregres- sive time series models would suggest.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文