Density Estimation in the Presence of Heteroscedastic Measurement Error
异方差测量误差下的密度估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般密度恢复与测量误差,未明确涉及分布效应或其他所列经济计量问题。
异方差测量误差下的密度估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We consider density estimation when the variable of interest is subject to heteroscedastic measurement error. The density is assumed to have a smooth but unknown functional form that we model with a penalized mixture of B-splines. We treat the situation in which multiple mismeasured observations of each variable of interest are observed for at least some of the subjects, and the measurement error is assumed to be additive and normal. The measurement error variance function is modeled with a second penalized mixture of B-splines. The article's main contributions are to address the effects of heteroscedastic measurement error effectively, explain the biases caused by ignoring heteroscedasticity, and present an equivalent kernel for a spline-based density estimator. Derivation of the equivalent kernel may be of independent interest. We use small-sigma asymptotics to approximate the biases incurred by assuming that the measurement error is homoscedastic when it actually is heteroscedastic. The biases incurred by misspecifying heteroscedastic measurement error as homoscedastic can be substantial. We fit the model using Bayesian methods and apply it to an example from nutritional epidemiology and a simulation experiment.