Handling Covariate Mismatch in Collaborative Linear Prediction
协作线性预测中的协变量不匹配处理AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用的多中心线性预测与缺失协变量,未限定宏观预测或其他所列方向。
协作线性预测中的协变量不匹配处理AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Training predictive models across multiple centers typically assumes that all centers collect the same set of covariates. In practice, however, they may record different features of their observations, a setting we refer to as covariate mismatch. We study linear prediction under this challenging setting, assuming center-wise MCAR missingness patterns, and develop estimators that exploit information across centers despite heterogeneous feature sets. In the low-dimensional regime, we propose a plug-in estimator of the oracle linear predictor based on component-wise aggregation of covariance and cross-moment estimates. In higher dimensions, we study an impute-then-regress strategy that first completes the missing covariates using an exchangeability-preserving imputation procedure and then fits a ridge-regularized linear model. All proposed estimators are compatible with federated learning constraints: individual-level data remain local to each center, and only aggregated quantities are exchanged. We provide asymptotic and finite-sample learning rates for our predictors, explicitly characterizing their behaviour with the global dimension, the center-specific feature partition, and the distribution of samples across centers, and validate our approach through numerical experiments.