跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究多个个体的纵向重复观测,并采用个体内观测数有限、个体数增大的框架,直接对应面板方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Alan H Welsh
Xihong Lin
Raymond J Carroll

纵向边际模型中的非参数回归

研究问题
在个体观测次数有限、个体数量较大的纵向边际模型中,估计非参数回归函数时是否应利用个体内相关结构?
方法与思路
作者在 GEE 型边际模型中比较核方法与样条方法,通过理论和数值计算分析平滑样条及惩罚回归样条的行为。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,样条在该模型中呈现非局部行为,利用相关结构值得考虑,并提供其可能比既有核方法更有效率的证据。
阅读关注点
应核对核方法与样条方法的比较条件、相关结构如何进入估计,以及效率结论对平滑参数和相关结构设定的依赖。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未给出效率比较的具体条件,不能据此断言样条普遍优于核方法。

原文摘要

We consider nonparametric regression in a longitudinal marginal model of generalized estimating equation (GEE) type with a time-varying covariate in the situation where the number of observations per subject is finite and the number of subjects is large. In such models, the basic shape of the regression function is affected only by the covariate values and not otherwise by the ordering of the observations. Two methods of estimating the nonparametric function can be considered: kernel methods and spline methods. Recently, surprising evidence has emerged suggesting that for kernel methods previously proposed in the literature, it is generally asymptotically preferable to ignore the correlation structure in our marginal model and instead assume that the data are independent, that is, working independence in the GEE jargon. As seen through equivalent kernel results, in univariate independent data problems splines and kernels have similar behavior; smoothing splines are equivalent to kernel regression with a specific higher-order kernel, and hence smoothing splines are local. This equivalence suggests that in our marginal model, working independence might be preferable for spline methods. Our results suggest the opposite; via theoretical and numerical calculations, we provide evidence suggesting that for our marginal model, marginal smoothing and penalized regression splines are not local in their behavior. In contrast to the kernel results, our evidence suggests that when using spline methods, it is worthwhile to account for the correlation structure. Our results also suggest that spline methods appear to be more efficient than the previously proposed kernel methods for our marginal model.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文