A Progressive Block Empirical Likelihood Method for Time Series
时间序列的渐进分块经验似然方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究平稳弱依赖时间过程的分块经验似然推断,对应时间序列方向。
时间序列的渐进分块经验似然方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article develops a new blockwise empirical likelihood (BEL) method for stationary, weakly dependent time processes, called the progressive block empirical likelihood (PBEL). In contrast to the standard version of BEL, which uses data blocks of constant length for a given sample size and whose performance can depend crucially on the block length selection, this new approach involves a data-blocking scheme where blocks increase in length by an arithmetic progression. Consequently, no block length selections are required for the PBEL method, which implies a certain type of robustness for this version of BEL. For inference of smooth functions of the process mean, theoretical results establish the chi-squared limit of the log-likelihood ratio based on PBEL, which can be used to calibrate confidence regions. Using the same progressive block scheme, distributional extensions are also provided for other nonparametric likelihoods with time series in the family of Cressie–Read discrepancies. Simulation evidence indicates that the PBEL method can perform comparably to the standard BEL in coverage accuracy (when the latter uses a “good” block choice) and can exhibit more stability, without the need to select a usual block length. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.