跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接比较消费者信心指数对消费支出时间序列的预测,并考察领先滞后关系和样本外表现。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
S. W. Burch
H. O. Stekler

消费者态度数据的预测准确性

研究问题
密歇根消费者信心指数能否有效预测耐用品消费支出的变动,含该指数的回归预测是否优于朴素预测模型?
方法与思路
作者分析信心指数与消费购买的领先滞后关系,重新拟合既有回归,并比较拟合期及拟合期后九个季度的预测。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要明确提出以朴素模型和样本外预测评价消费者态度数据,补充既有研究偏重解释与显著性的分析;未报告比较结果。
阅读关注点
应核对预测时可获得的信息、领先滞后设定、朴素模型定义和误差指标,以及九个季度样本外评价是否受到重新选模影响。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;摘要未报告预测误差或胜负结果,不能认定信心指数带来预测改善或因果效应。

原文摘要

This note evaluates the forecasting accuracy of the index of consumer sentiment constructed by the Michigan Survey Research Center. For the most part, other analyses have focused on the interpretation which should be given to an attitude variable or broadly described movements of the index of consumer sentiment in the vicinity of cyclical turning points. None of the studies have compared the accuracy of equations in which the attitude index is an independent variable against naive forecasting models. Thus, Eva Mueller [9] examined whether the index of consumer sentiment modified consumer responses to financial variables. Most of her equations explained variations in durable goods expenditures or automobile sales with the index and different forms of income, liquid asset, and unemployment variables. Since Mueller was not primarily interested in constructing a forecasting equation, her analysis of a large number of equations emphasized the interpretation and the significance of the index. F. Gerard Adams [1] examined the principal components of the index and also concluded that the attitude data were useful, although Friend and Adams [5] showed that stock prices and the length of workweek series shared the predictive ability of the attitude data. Suits and Sparks [11], however, elected to use the index in the automobile equation of the Brookings-SSRC Quarterly Econometric Model, and the index also appears in alternative formulations of the consumption functions of the Wharton-EFU model [4]. Subsequently, George Katona [7], reestimated Miss Mueller's preferred equation and discussed the predictions of the equation around cyclical turns.1 This well-known equation explains real household durable consumption purchases in the half year following the survey with the index and deflated household disposable income in the previous half year. More recently, E. Scott Maynes [8] refit this equation with an iterative technique which reduced the autocorrelation of the residuals. Neither Katona nor Maynes, however, investigated the entire lead-lag relationship between the index and consumer purchases or evaluated with strict standards the movements of the index. The following sections analyze the forecasting record of the index of consumer sentiment as an indicator of movements in the durable consumption expenditures series. Subsequently, several of the regressions previously found useful are refitted, and the forecasts of these equations are compared with predictions from naive models during both the period of fit and for nine quarters beyond the period of fit.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文