Privacy-Preserving Parametric Inference: A Case for Robust Statistics
保护隐私的参数推断:稳健统计的作用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦差分隐私与稳健参数推断的通用理论,未提供具体经济计量细分依据。
保护隐私的参数推断:稳健统计的作用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Differential privacy is a cryptographically motivated approach to privacy that has become a very active field of research over the last decade in theoretical computer science and machine learning. In this paradigm, one assumes there is a trusted curator who holds the data of individuals in a database and the goal of privacy is to simultaneously protect individual data while allowing the release of global characteristics of the database. In this setting, we introduce a general framework for parametric inference with differential privacy guarantees. We first obtain differentially private estimators based on bounded influence M-estimators by leveraging their gross-error sensitivity in the calibration of a noise term added to them to ensure privacy. We then show how a similar construction can also be applied to construct differentially private test statistics analogous to the Wald, score, and likelihood ratio tests. We provide statistical guarantees for all our proposals via an asymptotic analysis. An interesting consequence of our results is to further clarify the connection between differential privacy and robust statistics. In particular, we demonstrate that differential privacy is a weaker stability requirement than infinitesimal robustness, and show that robust M-estimators can be easily randomized to guarantee both differential privacy and robustness toward the presence of contaminated data. We illustrate our results both on simulated and real data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.