跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕社会网络招募、个体度数及其测量误差开展建模,直接涉及网络数据方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yibo Wang
Sunghee Lee
Michael R. Elliott

受访者驱动抽样中个体网络度数的潜变量模型

研究问题
受访者驱动抽样依靠自报网络度数校正不等抽样概率,如何处理度数报告误差并改善隐蔽总体的参数估计?
方法与思路
作者把真实度数视为潜变量,通过报告机制描述测量误差,并结合招募模式及外部人口特征信息构建度数估计方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,案例和模拟展示了较准确可靠的度数估计,并说明其可带来总体参数估计的显著改善。
阅读关注点
应核对真实度数与报告机制的可识别性、招募信息模型、外部人口资料的适用性,以及度数误差如何传递至总体估计。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;报告机制和招募过程条件未说明,度数改善不能直接保证样本代表性。

原文摘要

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is widely used to collect data from hidden populations in social and biomedical science. Although RDS may provide comprehensive coverage of the target hidden population through social network recruitment, its non-random sampling process poses challenges for generalizing findings beyond the sample. Current analytical methods rely on the network size (degree) reported by respondents to adjust for unequal sampling probabilities. However, the accuracy of the reported degree is questionable due to reporting errors, evidenced through an unusual frequency of multiples of five and improbably large values. To address this measurement error, we leverage a byproduct of the RDS process (e.g., respondents' recruitment patterns) and develop a novel degree estimator based on a latent variable model of the true degree that accounts for response errors via a reporting mechanism and incorporates recruitment information and external demographic profiles. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through a case study and a simulation study, which shows accurate and reliable degree estimates leading to significant improvements in population parameter estimation.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文