跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究自适应实验中的动作分配、政策价值评价与双重稳健估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ye Shen
Hengrui Cai
Rui Song

在线学习中最优政策评价的双重稳健区间估计

研究问题
在自适应在线实验产生相关数据、最优政策未知且探索与利用并存时,如何实时估计政策价值并构造有效区间?
方法与思路
作者推导常用赌博机算法选择非最优动作的探索概率,用于动作条件均值推断,并构造双重稳健政策价值估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称 DREAM 方法为一致性提供双重保护,建立价值估计量的渐近正态性,并给出 Wald 型置信区间。
阅读关注点
应核对双重保护对应的模型、探索概率估计、动作覆盖与政策估计误差,以及区间目标和在线停止规则的关系。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;双重稳健条件与收敛速率未列明,Wald 区间不能据此认定任意停止有效或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Evaluating the performance of an ongoing policy plays a vital role in many areas such as medicine and economics, to provide crucial instructions on the early-stop of the online experiment and timely feedback from the environment. Policy evaluation in online learning thus attracts increasing attention by inferring the mean outcome of the optimal policy (i.e., the value) in real-time. Yet, such a problem is particularly challenging due to the dependent data generated in the online environment, the unknown optimal policy, and the complex exploration and exploitation tradeoff in the adaptive experiment. In this article, we aim to overcome these difficulties in policy evaluation for online learning. We explicitly derive the probability of exploration that quantifies the probability of exploring nonoptimal actions under commonly used bandit algorithms. We use this probability to conduct valid inference on the online conditional mean estimator under each action and develop the doubly robust interval estimation (DREAM) method to infer the value under the estimated optimal policy in online learning. The proposed value estimator provides double protection for consistency and is asymptotically normal with a Wald-type confidence interval provided. Extensive simulation studies and real data applications are conducted to demonstrate the empirical validity of the proposed DREAM method. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

笔记与分组