跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究生物医学半参数交互检验,重复响应的提及不足以确认其属于所列面板数据方向。

反馈分类问题

Testing in Semiparametric Models with Interaction, with Applications to Gene–Environment Interactions

含交互作用的半参数模型检验及基因—环境交互应用

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Arnab Maity
Raymond J. Carroll
Enno Mammen

含交互作用的半参数模型检验及基因—环境交互应用

研究问题
在参数与非参数协变量以 Tukey 单自由度形式交互的半参数回归中,如何构造有效且易实现的得分检验,并处理重复响应?
方法与思路
作者构造剖面得分统计量,以对目标函数的解释简化积分方程相关估计,并用模拟及基因与吸烟史研究数据展示。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称原得分检验存在偏差且需要欠平滑,新统计量无偏并渐近有效,可用常规带宽选择,相关估计也更易实现。
阅读关注点
应核对交互结构、非参数分量与带宽条件、重复响应依赖的处理,以及无偏性、渐近效率和病例对照应用的具体含义。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断完整模型条件及模拟改善幅度;病例对照应用描述的是关联,不能据此推断基因或吸烟的因果效应。

原文摘要

Summary Motivated from the problem of testing for genetic effects on complex traits in the presence of gene–environment interaction, we develop score tests in general semiparametric regression problems that involves Tukey style 1 degree-of-freedom form of interaction between parametrically and non-parametrically modelled covariates. We find that the score test in this type of model, as recently developed by Chatterjee and co-workers in the fully parametric setting, is biased and requires undersmoothing to be valid in the presence of non-parametric components. Moreover, in the presence of repeated outcomes, the asymptotic distribution of the score test depends on the estimation of functions which are defined as solutions of integral equations, making implementation difficult and computationally taxing. We develop profiled score statistics which are unbiased and asymptotically efficient and can be performed by using standard bandwidth selection methods. In addition, to overcome the difficulty of solving functional equations, we give easy interpretations of the target functions, which in turn allow us to develop estimation procedures that can be easily implemented by using standard computational methods. We present simulation studies to evaluate type I error and power of the method proposed compared with a naive test that does not consider interaction. Finally, we illustrate our methodology by analysing data from a case–control study of colorectal adenoma that was designed to investigate the association between colorectal adenoma and the candidate gene NAT2 in relation to smoking history.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文