跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究网络干扰下的因果效应、识别假设与协变量调整。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Laura Forastiere
Edoardo M. Airoldi
Fabrizia Mealli

网络观察性研究中处理效应与干扰效应的识别和估计

研究问题
当个人结果同时取决于自身及邻居的处理时,如何在网络观察性研究中定义、识别并估计直接处理效应与干扰效应?
方法与思路
作者扩展无混杂假设,定义效应目标并推导忽略干扰的估计偏差,再用广义倾向得分平衡个人与邻域协变量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,忽略干扰的偏差取决于干扰强度及个人与邻域处理的关联;提出调整方法,并以青少年友谊网络校准模拟。
阅读关注点
应核对邻居处理暴露的定义、扩展无混杂与支持条件、广义倾向得分的平衡目标,以及模拟如何体现网络依赖。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要;具体识别条件与模拟结果未提供,校准使用真实网络不等于报告了真实处理的因果效应。

原文摘要

Laura Forastierea , Edoardo M. Airoldib* & Fabrizia Meallica Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CTb Department of Statistical Science, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, PAc Department of Statistics, Informatics, Applications “G. Parenti”, University of Florence, Florence, ItalySupplementary materials for this article are available online. Please go to www.tandfonline.com/r/JASA.CONTACT Edoardo M. Airoldi airoldi@temple.edu Department of Statistical Science, Fox School of Business, Temple University, 1810 Liacouras Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19122Abstract–Causal inference on a population of units connected through a network often presents technical challenges, including how to account for interference. In the presence of interference, for instance, potential outcomes of a unit depend on their treatment as well as on the treatments of other units, such as their neighbors in the network. In observational studies, a further complication is that the typical unconfoundedness assumption must be extended—say, to include the treatment of neighbors, and individual and neighborhood covariates—to guarantee identification and valid inference. Here, we propose new estimands that define treatment and interference effects. We then derive analytical expressions for the bias of a naive estimator that wrongly assumes away interference. The bias depends on the level of interference but also on the degree of association between individual and neighborhood treatments. We propose an extended unconfoundedness assumption that accounts for interference, and we develop new covariate-adjustment methods that lead to valid estimates of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. Estimation is based on a generalized propensity score that balances individual and neighborhood covariates across units under different levels of individual treatment and of exposure to neighbors’ treatment. We carry out simulations, calibrated using friendship networks and covariates in a nationally representative longitudinal study of adolescents in grades 7–12 in the United States, to explore finite-sample performance in different realistic settings. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文