Macroeconomic Volatility, Predictability, and Uncertainty in the Great Moderation
大缓和时期的宏观波动、可预测性与不确定性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及自回归冲击、专业宏观预测调查,以及消费资本资产定价模型中的股权溢价。
大缓和时期的宏观波动、可预测性与不确定性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
I examine the extent to which the large decline in observed real output volatility, that is, the great moderation, can be attributed to changes in macroeconomic uncertainty and macroeconomic predictability using forecasts of future real output growth from the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF). The results indicate that both predictability and uncertainty have declined over the great moderation. The results indicate that measuring the decline in macroeconomic uncertainty with the volatility of shocks from a fixed-parameter autoregressive model overstates the decline in uncertainty by between 20% and 25%. I examine how this overstatement affects predictions of the equity premium in the consumption capital asset pricing model (CCAPM), and I relate the decline in predictability to a significant change in the relationship between SPF forecasts and key measures of current macroeconomic performance.