跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确针对随机完全区组实验中的处理效应检验,直接关联随机实验推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stephen C. Hora
Ronald L. Iman

随机完全区组设计中秩变换程序的渐近相对效率

研究问题
在含区组因素的随机实验中,秩变换、对齐秩、Friedman 和常规 F 检验的功效如何随组内分布及区组效应而变化?
方法与思路
作者推导秩变换统计量的极限非中心参数,通过渐近相对效率比较四种检验,并分析不同组内密度及区组位置和尺度效应。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称不同秩检验的效率对实验因素数量和区组位置移动具有不同敏感性,并提供一个处理联合极限分布的引理。
阅读关注点
应核对局部备择和极限过程、联合分布引理的前提、六种比较情景,以及区组效应如何改变各检验的相对效率。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化;效率结果限于所分析情景,渐近相对效率不等于有限样本功效保证。

原文摘要

This article provides insight into the powers of alternative tests for experimental effects in the presence of a blocking factor. Three rank tests and the usual F test are compared using asymptotic relative efficiencies (ARE's). Rank tests provide a useful alternative method of analysis when the assumptions of the F test are not met. Further, rank tests are usually more powerful than the F test when outliers are present or when the distribution of the data possesses heavy tails. The rank tests studied are Friedman's test, the aligned-ranks test, and the rank-transformation procedure. The rank-transformation test consists of ranking all of the data as one sample and then applying the usual F test to the ranks. Two main themes form the body of the article. The first theme is the development of the limiting noncentrality parameter of the rank-transformation statistic. The development uses the methods popularized by Hájek and Šidák (1967). A lemma is given that establishes the joint limiting distribution of individually asymptotically normal dependent random variables, if such a distribution exists. This lemma may have application outside the area studied here. The second theme is the evaluation of the ARE's among the four tests. Six distinct situations are analyzed. These situations are generated by selecting from several within-block densities and from several types of block effects that include location shifts and scale changes. The ARE's of the aligned-ranks test and Friedman's test relative to the usual F test are shown to be affected by the number of experimental factors, whereas the ARE of the rank-transformation procedure is not affected. Conversely, the ARE of the rank-transformation test is affected by block location shifts, whereas the other tests are unaffected. In the cases studied with normally distributed block location shifts, the ARE of the rank-transformation test to the normal-theory test falls to .866 as the variance of the block shifts becomes large relative to the within-block dispersion. For the cases studied with block shifts drawn from a uniform distribution, this ARE approaches 1 as the variance of the block shifts becomes large.

笔记与分组