跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用非参数回归的平滑参数选择与计算,应用为分子动力学,未提供宏观预测等所列方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xiaoxiao Sun
Wenxuan Zhong
Ping Ma

大样本平滑样条 ANOVA 模型的渐近与经验平滑参数选择

研究问题
大样本平滑样条 ANOVA 模型中,如何降低平滑参数选择的计算成本,同时保持相对于指定风险准则的统计效率?
方法与思路
作者通过渐近分析确定最优平滑参数与样本量的幂函数关系,再用经验子样本外推估计其中未知常数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称所选参数趋于指定风险下的最优参数,估计量达到最优收敛率,并在模拟和近百万观测应用中展示计算优势。
阅读关注点
应核对风险函数及最优性的定义、子样本外推规则、样本量幂关系的条件,以及计算与预测比较的具体设置。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,不能判断最优性适用范围;分子动力学应用中的最佳预测表现不意味着所有任务均占优。

原文摘要

Summary Large samples are generated routinely from various sources. Classic statistical models, such as smoothing spline ANOVA models, are not well equipped to analyse such large samples because of high computational costs. In particular, the daunting computational cost of selecting smoothing parameters renders smoothing spline ANOVA models impractical. In this article, we develop an asympirical, i.e., asymptotic and empirical, smoothing parameters selection method for smoothing spline ANOVA models in large samples. The idea of our approach is to use asymptotic analysis to show that the optimal smoothing parameter is a polynomial function of the sample size and an unknown constant. The unknown constant is then estimated through empirical subsample extrapolation. The proposed method significantly reduces the computational burden of selecting smoothing parameters in high-dimensional and large samples. We show that smoothing parameters chosen by the proposed method tend to the optimal smoothing parameters that minimize a specific risk function. In addition, the estimator based on the proposed smoothing parameters achieves the optimal convergence rate. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the numerical advantage of the proposed method over competing methods in terms of relative efficacy and running time. In an application to molecular dynamics data containing nearly one million observations, the proposed method has the best prediction performance.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文