跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的核心是随机先行约束下的分布估计及分布间比较,直接对应分布方法方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Miguel A Arcones
Paul H Kvam

随机先行约束下的分布非参数估计

研究问题
当实验数据的分布满足随机先行约束时,如何构造遵守该约束的非参数估计,并刻画其渐近行为和相对表现?
方法与思路
作者分别通过数据收缩与数据平移构造满足约束的分布估计量,分析其渐近性质,并讨论右删失数据情形。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两类估计量均具有根号样本量一致性,并给出渐近刻画与等价条件;部分情形下的大样本优势获分析和模拟支持。
阅读关注点
应核对随机先行与其他随机序的区别、独立性条件、约束边界的渐近行为,以及右删失下与 Kaplan–Meier 估计的关系。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;等价条件、比较损失及样本规模阈值未说明,所述优势不能理解为所有分布和样本下均成立。

原文摘要

For any two random variables X and Y with distributions F and G defined on [0,∞), X is said to stochastically precede Y if P(X≤Y) ≥ 1/2. For independent X and Y, stochastic precedence (denoted by X≤spY) is equivalent to E[G(X–)] ≤ 1/2. The applicability of stochastic precedence in various statistical contexts, including reliability modeling, tests for distributional equality versus various alternatives, and the relative performance of comparable tolerance bounds, is discussed. The problem of estimating the underlying distribution(s) of experimental data under the assumption that they obey a stochastic precedence (sp) constraint is treated in detail. Two estimation approaches, one based on data shrinkage and the other involving data translation, are used to construct estimators that conform to the sp constraint, and each is shown to lead to a root n-consistent estimator of the underlying distribution. The asymptotic behavior of each of the estimators is fully characterized. Conditions are given under which each estimator is asymptotically equivalent to the corresponding empirical distribution function or, in the case of right censoring, the Kaplan–Meier estimator. In the complementary cases, evidence is presented, both analytically and via simulation, demonstrating that the new estimators tend to outperform the empirical distribution function when sample sizes are sufficiently large.

笔记与分组