跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是购买事件时点与持续期模型,未明确提供所列离散选择或结构估计方向所需的模型证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

购买时点的比例风险模型

研究问题
如何描述家庭购买洗衣剂和纸巾的时点,并区分基准购买规律、营销变量、购物经历和未观测家庭异质性的作用?
方法与思路
作者比较连续与离散时间比例风险模型、不同基准风险形式及竞争风险设定,并以离散分布刻画家庭参数异质性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称离散时间与特定竞争风险设定拟合更好,三参数expo-power形式表现较优,并发现显著的未观测异质性。
阅读关注点
应核对购买事件和竞争风险类别的定义、购物机会如何进入模型、比较指标,以及异质性分布的估计与解释。
阅读边界
仅依据OpenAlex摘要;营销变量的外生性、模型识别与比较细节未说明,拟合差异不能直接解释为营销干预的因果效应。

原文摘要

We use the proportional hazard model (PHM) to study purchase-timing behavior of households in two product categories: laundry detergents and paper towels. The PHM decomposes a household's instantaneous probability of buying the product at a point of time into two components: the baseline hazard that captures the household's intrinsic purchase pattern over time and the covariate function that captures the effects of marketing variables on the household's purchase timing decision. We compare the continuoustime and discrete-time PHMs, where the latter explicitly accounts for households' shopping trips that do not involve purchase of the product. We find that the discrete-time PHM empirically outperforms the continuous-time PHM in terms of explaining the observed purchase outcomes. We compare five different parametric specifications of the baseline hazard, and find that the three-parameter expo-power specification outperforms the exponential, Erlang-2, Weibull, and log-logistic specifications. We use a causespecific, competing-risks PHM to distinguish between two types of purchase events that differ in terms of whether or not they were preceded by a shopping trip that involved purchase of the product. Such a cause-specific, competing-risks PHM is shown to outperform the traditional discrete-time PHM. We then estimate a nonparametric version of the PHM and find that it does not offer any additional insights compared to the parsimonious parametric PHM. Finally, we accommodate unobserved heterogeneity across households by allowing all of the parameters of the PHM to follow a discrete distribution across households whose locations and supports are nonparametrically estimated from the data. We find evidence for substantial unobserved heterogeneity in the data, both in the parameters of marketing variables and in the baseline hazards. This study will be a useful reference to researchers hoping to use the PHM to study event times.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文