跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用EM算法的标准误计算,混合模型与缺失数据例子不足以对应所列经济学细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mortaza Jamshidian
R. I. Jennrich

EM估计的标准误

研究问题
EM算法计算极大似然估计时通常不直接产生标准误,如何通过数值微分获得标准误,并评估计算复杂度与精度?
方法与思路
作者比较微分Fisher得分向量和微分EM算子两条路径,提出三种算法,并与SEM算法在七个例子中比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,示例中存在比SEM更简单且更准确的算法,并表明对称性诊断能够估计数值微分所引入的误差。
阅读关注点
核对三种算法所需的导数与矩阵计算、数值微分设置、对称性诊断依据,以及EM收敛速度如何影响标准误计算。
阅读边界
仅依据Crossref摘要;算法细节和误差数值未提供,示例中的优势不能据此推广为所有EM应用中的普遍优势。

原文摘要

Summary The EM algorithm is a popular method for computing maximum likelihood estimates. One of its drawbacks is that it does not produce standard errors as a by-product. We consider obtaining standard errors by numerical differentiation. Two approaches are considered. The first differentiates the Fisher score vector to yield the Hessian of the log-likelihood. The second differentiates the EM operator and uses an identity that relates its derivative to the Hessian of the log-likelihood. The well-known SEM algorithm uses the second approach. We consider three additional algorithms: one that uses the first approach and two that use the second. We evaluate the complexity and precision of these three and the SEM in algorithm seven examples. The first is a single-parameter example used to give insight. The others are three examples in each of two areas of EM application: Poisson mixture models and the estimation of covariance from incomplete data. The examples show that there are algorithms that are much simpler and more accurate than the SEM algorithm. Hopefully their simplicity will increase the availability of standard error estimates in EM applications. It is shown that, as previously conjectured, a symmetry diagnostic can accurately estimate errors arising from numerical differentiation. Some issues related to the speed of the EM algorithm and algorithms that differentiate the EM operator are identified.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文