Calibrating the Scan Statistic: Finite Sample Performance Versus Asymptotics
扫描统计量的校准:有限样本表现与渐近理论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般高斯序列及其他分布中的区间信号检测,未明确宏观时间序列结构变化或其他所列应用方向。
反馈分类问题扫描统计量的校准:有限样本表现与渐近理论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Abstract We consider the problem of detecting an elevated mean on an interval with unknown location and length in the univariate Gaussian sequence model. Recent results have shown that using scale-dependent critical values for the scan statistic allows to attain asymptotically optimal detection simultaneously for all signal lengths, thereby improving on the traditional scan, but this procedure has been criticised for losing too much power for short signals. We explain this discrepancy by showing that these asymptotic optimality results will necessarily be too imprecise to discern the performance of scan statistics in a practically relevant way, even in a large sample context. Instead, we propose to assess the performance with a new finite sample criterion. We then present three calibrations for scan statistics that perform well across a range of relevant signal lengths: The first calibration uses a particular adjustment to the critical values and is therefore tailored to the Gaussian case. The second calibration uses a scale-dependent adjustment to the significance levels rather than to the critical values and this adjustment is therefore applicable to arbitrary known null distributions. The third calibration restricts the scan to a particular sparse subset of the scan windows and then applies a weighted Bonferroni adjustment to the corresponding test statistics. This Bonferroni scan is also applicable to arbitrary null distributions and in addition is very simple to implement. We show how to apply these calibrations for scanning in a number of distributional settings: for normal observations with an unknown baseline and a known or unknown constant variance, for observations from a natural exponential family, for potentially heteroscadastic observations from a symmetric density by employing self-normalisation in a novel way, and for exchangeable observations using tests based on permutations, ranks or signs.