Modified Large-Sample Confidence Intervals for Linear Combinations of Variance Components
方差分量线性组合的修正大样本置信区间AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究正态模型方差分量的置信推断,应用为生物等效性;未明确面板、金融波动率或其他所列经济领域。
反馈分类问题方差分量线性组合的修正大样本置信区间AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We consider the problem of setting a confidence interval or bound for a linear combination of variance components related to a multivariate normal distribution, which includes important applications such as comparing variance components and testing the bioequivalence between two drug products. The lack of an exact confidence interval for a general linear combination of variance components spurred the development of a modified large-sample (MLS) method that was shown to be superior to many other approximation methods. But existing MLS method requires the use of independent estimators of variance components. Using a chi-squared representation of a quadratic form of a multivariate normal vector, we extend the MLS method to situations in which estimators of variance components are dependent. Using Edgeworth and Cornish–Fisher expansions, we explicitly derive the second-order asymptotic coverage error of the MLS confidence bound. Our results show that the MLS confidence bound is not second-order accurate in general, but is much better than the confidence bound based on normal approximation and is nearly second-order accurate in some special cases. Our results also show how to construct an MLS confidence bound that is second-order accurate. As an application, we discuss the use of the MLS method in assessing population bioequivalence, with some simulation results and an example.