跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用多重检验与稀疏决策理论,未明确对应所列计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Małgorzata Bogdan
Arijit Chakrabarti
Florian Frommlet
Jayanta K. Ghosh

稀疏情形下若干多重检验程序的渐近贝叶斯最优性

研究问题
当真实备择比例趋于零时,哪些多重检验规则的贝叶斯风险可逼近理想规则,错误发现率水平应如何随损失设定?
方法与思路
作者在正态尺度混合模型与可加检验损失下,以风险比趋于一界定稀疏渐近贝叶斯最优性,并分析阈值及常用校正程序。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称刻画了固定阈值规则的最优性条件,并给出 BFDR、BH 和 Bonferroni 的适用条件;BH 的水平选择依赖错误成本。
阅读关注点
应核对稀疏渐近框架、信号尺度和错误成本条件,以及固定阈值结论如何转用于 BH 的随机阈值与错误发现率选择。
阅读边界
来源为稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;最优性限于所设模型、损失和渐近框架,不能据此声称常用程序普遍最优。

原文摘要

Within a Bayesian decision theoretic framework we investigate some asymptotic optimality properties of a large class of multiple testing rules. A parametric setup is considered, in which observations come from a normal scale mixture model and the total loss is assumed to be the sum of losses for individual tests. Our model can be used for testing point null hypotheses, as well as to distinguish large signals from a multitude of very small effects. A rule is defined to be asymptotically Bayes optimal under sparsity (ABOS), if within our chosen asymptotic framework the ratio of its Bayes risk and that of the Bayes oracle (a rule which minimizes the Bayes risk) converges to one. Our main interest is in the asymptotic scheme where the proportion p of “true” alternatives converges to zero. We fully characterize the class of fixed threshold multiple testing rules which are ABOS, and hence derive conditions for the asymptotic optimality of rules controlling the Bayesian False Discovery Rate (BFDR). We finally provide conditions under which the popular Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) and Bonferroni procedures are ABOS and show that for a wide class of sparsity levels, the threshold of the former can be approximated by a nonrandom threshold. It turns out that while the choice of asymptotically optimal FDR levels for BH depends on the relative cost of a type I error, it is almost independent of the level of sparsity. Specifically, we show that when the number of tests m increases to infinity, then BH with FDR level chosen in accordance with the assumed loss function is ABOS in the entire range of sparsity parameters p ∝ m−β, with β ∈ (0, 1].

笔记与分组