A precise high-dimensional asymptotic theory for boosting and minimum-ℓ1-norm interpolated classifiers
Boosting 与最小 ℓ1 范数插值分类器的精确高维渐近理论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高维分类算法的一般理论,未涉及所列经济金融预测或其他细分应用。
Boosting 与最小 ℓ1 范数插值分类器的精确高维渐近理论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper establishes a precise high-dimensional asymptotic theory for boosting on separable data, taking statistical and computational perspectives. We consider a high-dimensional setting where the number of features (weak learners) p scales with the sample size n, in an overparametrized regime. Under a class of statistical models, we provide an exact analysis of the generalization error of boosting when the algorithm interpolates the training data and maximizes the empirical ℓ1-margin. Further, we explicitly pin down the relation between the boosting test error and the optimal Bayes error, as well as the proportion of active features at interpolation (with zero initialization). In turn, these precise characterizations answer certain questions raised in (Neural Comput. 11 (1999) 1493–1517; Ann. Statist. 26 (1998) 1651–1686) surrounding boosting, under assumed data generating processes. At the heart of our theory lies an in-depth study of the maximum-ℓ1-margin, which can be accurately described by a new system of nonlinear equations; to analyze this margin, we rely on Gaussian comparison techniques and develop a novel uniform deviation argument. Our statistical and computational arguments can handle (1) any finite-rank spiked covariance model for the feature distribution and (2) variants of boosting corresponding to general ℓq-geometry, q∈[1,2]. As a final component, via the Lindeberg principle, we establish a universality result showcasing that the scaled ℓ1-margin (asymptotically) remains the same, whether the covariates used for boosting arise from a nonlinear random feature model or an appropriately linearized model with matching moments.