跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维检验的统计与计算界限,未涉及所列因子模型或其他计量细分应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ankur Moitra
Alexander S. Wein

计算高效检验的精确错误率

研究问题
当高维问题中的似然比检验难以计算时,计算高效检验可达到怎样的一类与二类错误权衡,其极限是否不同于统计极限?
方法与思路
作者在具有一般独立同分布尖峰先验的 Wigner 模型中,结合低阶似然比范数界与可达性结果分析线性谱统计量检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在强化低阶猜想成立的条件下,已有谱检验达到高效检验的最佳错误权衡,而指数时间检验能够取得更好表现。
阅读关注点
应核对复杂性猜想的精确内容、计算高效的定义、先验条件和渐近错误曲线,并区分条件性困难结果与可达性证明。
阅读边界
来源为稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;核心最优性结论依赖未证猜想,不能视为无条件定理或推广到任意高维模型。

原文摘要

We revisit the fundamental question of simple-versus-simple hypothesis testing with an eye toward computational complexity, as the statistically optimal likelihood ratio test is often computationally intractable in high-dimensional settings. In the classical spiked Wigner model with a general i.i.d. spike prior, we show (conditional on a conjecture) that an existing test based on linear spectral statistics achieves the best possible trade-off curve between type-I and type-II error rates among all computationally efficient tests, even though there are exponential-time tests that do better. This result is conditional on an appropriate complexity-theoretic conjecture, namely a natural strengthening of the well-established low-degree conjecture. Our result shows that the spectrum is a sufficient statistic for computationally bounded tests (but not for all tests). To our knowledge, our approach gives the first tool for reasoning about the precise asymptotic testing error achievable with efficient computation. The main ingredients required for our hardness result are a sharp bound on the norm of the low-degree likelihood ratio along with (counterintuitively) a positive result on achievability of testing. This strategy appears to be new even in the setting of unbounded computation, in which case it gives an alternate way to analyze the fundamental statistical limits of testing.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文