Uniform predictive inference for factor models with instrumental and idiosyncratic betas
含特征驱动与特异 beta 的因子模型统一预测推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要使用高频收益估计金融因子与时变 beta,并明确开展波动率预测。
含特征驱动与特异 beta 的因子模型统一预测推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper investigates the impact of allowing for characteristic-based time-varying factor betas on the diffusion-index type forecasts. The factor beta consists of two distinct components: the “instrumental beta” is a function of some observable characteristics, while the “idiosyncratic beta” captures more volatile residual movements. To estimate these characteristic-based time-varying betas and the corresponding factors, we apply the projected principal component analysis (P-PCA) method on high-frequency returns data. The primary advantage of this method is that it refines the estimators of latent factors, which shall be used in the forecasting models. We show that various leading components of the conditional mean forecast error are all asymptotically normal and pairwise independent. Extensive simulation studies show the good finite-sample properties of the P-PCA estimators and demonstrate the advantage of the P-PCA method relative to the classic PCA method in forecasting. In our empirical experiments of volatility prediction, we find that the factor-augmented model associated with the P-PCA method is more parsimonious and achieves better performance for a wide variety of target assets. We also find evidence on different levels of variation over time in the idiosyncratic beta, which necessitates our uniform predictive inference procedure.