Testing and Support Recovery in Population-Based Image Data
群体影像数据的检验与差异位置恢复AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文章研究高维影像的均值检验和位置恢复,未提供归入所列经济学细分方向的依据。
群体影像数据的检验与差异位置恢复AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this article, we propose a multiscale adaptive test to detect differences between two samples of intrinsically smoothed image data in high-dimensional context. The test aggregates data from nearby locations using adaptive weights, significantly enhancing statistical power. We demonstrate that the test statistic converges to a Gumbel extreme value distribution under the null hypothesis. Moreover, we investigate its multiscale nature, showing that the chosen scales can grow at a specific polynomial rate of the sample size. We also evaluate its power against sparse alternatives and establish that with probability approaching one, the proposed method can identify the locations where the two means differ from each other. Additionally, we extend the proposed method to multi-sample ANOVA tests. Simulation results suggest that the proposed test outperforms the non-multiscale method that ignores spatial features of imaging data. The procedures are illustrated using a real dataset from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.