跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高频金融创新的局部分布,以非参数波动率标准化,并应用于股指、商品和汇率。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ulrich Hounyo

高频局部分布推断:自助法方法

研究问题
在高频创新经过随机波动尺度标准化和大跳跃截断后,如何对其局部分布及局部高斯性推断,并处理估计误差产生的依赖?
方法与思路
作者提出局部依赖野生自助法与局部块自助法,利用二阶分布理论处理随机尺度、跳跃、块依赖及渐近偏差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两种自助法在二阶分布层面渐近等价,相关局部检验有效;模拟中野生自助法的尺寸比中心极限定理检验更准确。
阅读关注点
应核对局部窗口、波动率估计及截断阈值的联合条件,并检查重抽样如何复制一阶过程、二阶尺度误差和渐近偏差。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,不能判断尺寸改善是否适用于其他采样机制;摘要未给出具体误差幅度,也未说明微观结构噪声处理。

原文摘要

We study inference for the local innovations of Itô semimartingales. Specifically, we construct a resampling procedure for the empirical CDF of high-frequency innovations that have been standardized using a nonparametric estimate of its stochastic scale (volatility) and truncated to rid the effect of “large” jumps. Our locally dependent wild bootstrap (LDWB) accommodate issues related to the stochastic scale and jumps as well as account for a special block-wise dependence structure induced by sampling errors. We show that the LDWB replicates first and second-order limit theory from the usual empirical process and the stochastic scale estimate, respectively, in addition to an asymptotic bias. Moreover, we design the LDWB sufficiently general to establish asymptotic equivalence between it and a nonparametric local block bootstrap, also introduced here, up to second-order distribution theory. Finally, we introduce LDWB-aided Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests for local Gaussianity as well as local von-Mises statistics, with and without bootstrap inference, and establish their asymptotic validity using the second-order distribution theory. The finite sample performance of CLT and LDWB-aided local Gaussianity tests is assessed in a simulation study and an empirical application. Whereas the CLT test is oversized, even in large samples, the size of the LDWB tests is accurate, even in small samples. The empirical analysis verifies this pattern, in addition to providing new insights about the fine scale distributional properties of innovations to equity indices, commodities and exchange rates.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文