Root n Bandwidth Selectors for Kernel Estimation of Density Derivatives
密度导数核估计的根号 n 带宽选择方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是通用密度导数带宽理论,需求法则仅作为潜在应用,不能据此认定结构估计方向。
密度导数核估计的根号 n 带宽选择方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Based on a random sample of size n from an unknown density f on the real line, the problem of adaptively selecting the bandwidth in kernel estimation of f (k) is investigated, where f (k) denotes the kth derivative of f. The estimates of density derivatives can be used to evaluate modes and inflection points of f and can be applied to the estimation of scores in certain additive models and to the empirical verification of the law of demand in econometrics. For all k, the information bounds for bandwidth selectors are given, and two types of adaptive bandwidth selectors are proposed. A careful analysis of the kernel estimate of the integrated squared bias (ISB) term, contained in a generalization of smoothed cross-validation, indicates that the “sync kernel” is the proper choice for estimating ISB and, consequently, leads to the first type of selector. The second type of selector is based on the plug-in method, which involves expanding ISB up to suitable order and estimating integrated squared density derivatives. It is shown that for all k and sufficiently smooth f and kernel, both of the proposed selectors are asymptotically normal with the optimal Op (n -1/2) relative convergence rate and achieve the (conjectured) information bound. This asymptotically optimal performance requires stronger smoothness assumptions on f and kernel for larger k. For k = 1 and 2, extensive simulation studies have been done, and the excellent performances of the proposed selectors at practical sample sizes are clearly demonstrated. In particular, the proposed selectors perform conclusively better than the one selected by cross-validation.