Detection of Unusual Increases in MRI Lesion Counts in Individual Multiple Sclerosis Patients
识别个体多发性硬化患者 MRI 病灶计数的异常增加AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用同一患者的重复计数、个体随机效应和时间相关性,直接对应纵向面板建模。
识别个体多发性硬化患者 MRI 病灶计数的异常增加AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Data Safety and Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for multiple sclerosis clinical trials consider an increase of contrast-enhancing lesions on repeated magnetic resonance imaging an indicator for potential adverse events. However, there are no published studies that clearly identify what should be considered an “unexpected increase” of lesion activity for a patient. To address this problem, we consider as an index the likelihood of observing lesion counts as large as those observed on the recent scans of a patient conditional on the patient’s lesion counts on previous scans. To estimate this index, we rely on random effects models. Given the patient-specific random effect, we assume that the repeated lesion counts from the same patient follow a negative binomial distribution and may be correlated over time. We fit the model using data collected from the trial under DSMB review and update the estimation when new data are to be reviewed. We consider two estimation procedures: maximum likelihood for a fully parameterized model and a simple semiparametric method for a model with an unspecified distribution for the random effects. We examine the performance of our methods using simulations and illustrate the approach using data from a clinical trial. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.